Compared to S3D, bridging improvement needed. (unless I missed a setting)
 
Notifications
Clear all

Compared to S3D, bridging improvement needed. (unless I missed a setting)  

  RSS
Jucytec
(@jucytec)
Active Member
Compared to S3D, bridging improvement needed. (unless I missed a setting)

I've just started using PrusaSlicer 2.2 over S3D.  For the most part it is creating very good results.  I've noticed bridging will only use 1 angle.

For example, in S3D, it'll figure out anything over X mm of travel and create a bridge the entire bottom side in any angle.  In PS it'll only do 1 angle.

Is there a setting for this somewhere?  take a look at the attached pic, left is S3D right is PS.  notice the yellow bridge on 2 different angles on S3D.

 

Posted : 28/03/2020 11:09 pm
Vojtěch Bubník
(@vojtech-bubnik)
Member Admin
RE: Compared to S3D, bridging improvement needed. (unless I missed a setting)

It is really best to check the following issues

https://github.com/prusa3d/PrusaSlicer/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Abridging

and add your example to the issue that best matches yours.

 

Posted : 29/03/2020 10:47 am
Share: